M y Theory
By jesse Babcock
My theory is an entirely different way, but a right way, of explaining everything.
How is it possible to make predictions from a theory for 55 years,and not have a single prediction be proven wrong, plus having several proven right, unless the theory is correct? I stand behind my claim that there is very little that science is exactly right about. This may be hard to believe but it is true. It seems that the science community steers away from anything logical.
Science believes that electricity is a thing in itself, and that is where they made their biggest mistake of all times: by assuming that everything is here just because it is here; when the truth is: it is only a flow of energy in a medium that is not well understood by scientists. They are using it and a lot of other things, such as particles as things in themselves. This is why math is so important to them, but understanding is much more complex than that. Instead of just a particle: there is a complete understanding there, if they could see what is happening.
There is no such thing as suction in our world, yet we have the name for it. If you can find anything that has actualIy been sucked, I want to hear about it. When we suck, (expandon the cavity of our mouth) on a straw, this is expanding a cavity against atmospheric .pressure, and that is pushing, and atmospheric pressure pushes the liquid into the cavity of our mouth. The word "suction" all by itself implies energy. Why do we have the word "suction" if we can not demonatrate it. I say "because my theory has to be right.."
The reason I was the one person that was most likely to get it right, is because I only had an eighth grade education: I had not been subjected to all the mistaken beliefs of science. Getting it right the first time is proof that common sense is better than observation, and the fact that I became interested in perpetual motion before 1923. I was born in 1915. This study gave me an advantage over scientists. It taught me a lot about common sense. This means that I was not older than 8 years when I became interested in perpetual motion. When I became 15 years old I predicted that the secret of the universe would have to become known before anyone could build such a device. The reason I said this was because I had just discovered that the most perfect idea for perpetual-motion still balanced out. I also seen that it would make a slide rule that showed anything mechanical will balance out. I will explain this to you.
If you take two wheels of spokes without the rims mounted side by side on the same shaft, each free-wheeling, and attach a hundred pound pull spring to the outer end of a spoke, and then attach the other end to the center of a spoke on the other wheel you will have a hundred pound pull on the rim the first spring is attached to, and a 50 pound pull on the rim of the wheel that the spring is attached to a spoke's center. This would pull a hundred pounds in one direction and pull back 50 pounds in the other direction. If you repeat this, you will have 200 pounds pulling one way against 100 pounds. If you wanted more energy just add more and stronger springs, and no matter how fast it ran: it would keep going faster until it flew apart. This would work only in theory because the angle of the springs cancels out the benefits. This also showed that if you changed the position of the springs it would still balance out.
I say that true suction is nature. Before I came up with my theory I believed suction was unlimited. I do not know if you can understand this or not, but when I put this and energy together I thought I had it all cut and dried. I thought suction was unlimited, and suction is energy. If you can truely explain how to create just one thing in space: you have explained it all. This has to be true because there can be only one explanation: so if you can't explain how it all started: (such as the Big Bang, or why a God has always existed) then you havent explained anything. The following is my explanation fo why a God has always existed.
In the fiirst place, nature (which is my theory) has always been here. This means that the universe has always been here. When I first came up with my theory I kept asking myself: what is love? What is hate? What is fear? What is peace? What is anger?What is awareness, and so forth? I finally decided that the answers were not in our world, but is borrowed from the Spiritual universe that my theory predicts.
I want to give you a simple example that will prove that all galaxies would be the shape of a doughnut if gravity were a pull: think of a long line of stars in a straight line; each end star will be pulled toward the other end until it reaches the center. The center star of this line of stars will be pulled as much one way as it is being pulled the other way. The pull between stars stays the same unless the distance between them changes. There is no way that a pull of gravity can cause density at the center pf a galaxy. It would cause the center to open up, and all the stars around this open area would move towards their nearest neighbor.
The following is how I came up with my theory.
In 1953 I was listening to the news on the radio when it was announced that the ground crews working on jet engines were receiving lung damage from the high frequency sound waves from jet engines. This would not surprise me today, but at that time, I thought that sound was nothing. I was surprised because I thought: "How could sound which is nothing...destroy lung tissue which is something?"
Well, like all Christians, at that time, I thought that anything was possible; so I thought: "Maybe everything is made from nothing?" Then I closed my eyes to try and picture what space would be like without anything in it. The picture that came to mind was just as shocking and educational as the news that sound could destroy lung tissue: It was the realization that "Space" has to be endless. Not so much as just being endless, but the fact that there is no other place for anything to come from. So If my theory is wrong, why are all my predictions, and assumptions coming true? an000000000000000000d why are scientists, especially astronomers, continually having to revise their theories?
Well I had enough sense to realize that whatever we were made of, it had to come from nothing but empty space, and whatever it was about empty space that caused everything to be created. This made me realize that there could not be anything that was a true solid, so my very first intentional prediction was that science would eventually discover that there was no such thing as a true solid. When I learned that science had already came to that conclusion...I was elated...It was like winning the jack-pot. This told me that I had to be on the right track. I was so certain I was right that I told an older brother that there had to be a way to package energy and that I would find it, and I did.
Figuring out the origin of everything is no big deal. Why should it be? If everything could be taken away: all that would be left is space. Think about it. All you need to know is: "How do you get something from just space?" If you can put a name to it that referes to a thing then you have to be wrong because that would be a thing, and nothing can exist without a reason. We only need to know that reason. This means that space has to have a characteristic that makes space dynamic, and that characteristic has to be: "True suction." True suction is not a thing: it is only a characteristec of space,
Us mortals can not grasp the truth of this because what we call suction is not suction. It is only the mirror image of "true suction" We expand a cavity against atmospheric pressure. and that is pushing: not sucking. There is not one single thing in our world of experience that has actually been sucked.
At the time I first figured this out: I thought "suction" was a natural experience, until it was explained to me that what we call "suction" is limited to atmospheric pressure. It then became a problem until I realized that it was impossible to test for true suction in our kind of world because our world does not have true solids, also all the basics of matter moves, plus it would require a true solid for us to create true suction. What we call "suction" is a mirror image of true "suction." Space relative to itself is a true solid.
Keep in mind that we are created. Only the creators can relate and understand that true suction is "nature itself." If you were a Spirit you would understand this.
4-10-07 I say there are natural laws that just have to be true. (1) Space has to be endless. (2) You can not have a situation in which nothing can exist, including space. (3) Anything that exists had to come from nothing but empty space and whatever characteristic space might have. (4) The universe is also endless. (5) Time is just a way of keeping records: If nothing at all existed you would have no way of keeping a record, but time would forever continue to lapse: there just would never be a record of it. (6) A universe of some description has been here forever: If there were a time when nothing at all existed, what could possibly make it change? (7) Nothing can happen without a reason. (8) There has to be, and is, an explanation for everything. (9) The reason for everything being here has to be the ultimate in simplicity: If not, what would create the complexities? (10) The reason for everything being here has to be something entirely natural. If not, there never would have been anything here in the first place. (11) The only thing that can explain all of the above is my theory: "True suction."
One of the reasons it is taking science so long to accept this is because of how we relate to reality. The problem is this: Different people have a different concept of reality. To a religious person: everything relating the Bible is reality. To some scientists: everything relating to Einstein's theory is a reality. To me: only reality itself is a reality, and the best way to determine which is correct is to add up which of the three can best predict the future. Under Rewards are several predications I made that came true, plus many that will come true. Almost all of science's predictions will have to be changed.
Everything needs, and does have an explanation." Also there can be only one explanation, and that explanation has to be the ultimate in simplicity and must be something entirely natural. If magic were possible: it would take on a life of its own. There is nothing in the entire universe that can not be explained.
Why the universe is here has been explained in all the early dictionaries. Read Items of interest and Gravity, or vice-versa, but I will try and get my point across right now. Space has to be endless. No matter what direction you go, you are not going to run into a brick wall. Space goes on forever. This means that no matter what space is: Space is all there is for anything to come from. This means: that in a sense everything had to come from nothing, or to put it another way: everything had to come from whatever it is that "Space" is.
Where before we had nothing: Now we have space that is dynamic, and the whole of space must be perfectly balanced, such as balancing a straight pin on its point, or it is going to try and balance itself at a velocity that is normal for that kind of medium. Also where before we had nothing: now we have something.
This is why true suction seems so unreal to us. A world of pressures would seem just as unreal to this other world. In other words we can not experience Heaven until we become a part of it.
This is the only theory that explains everything except how all the pieces fit together, and this is what science should be trying to do, instead of trying to give everything an equation. Everything is cause and effect.
Most people do not realize that a lot of scientific thought was first introduced by me.
The reason science has not been able to explain why everything is here is not because it is too complicated: it is only because there is so much that we see and experience that leads us in the wrong direction. (1) There seems to be a connection between gravity and magnetism, but there is no connection, I need to make this understandable: There is a connection, but only after you understand my theory. (2) Demonstrations lead people to believe that suction is limited to atmospheric pressure, but there is no way that true suction can ever really be demonstrated in our world. What was really demonstrated was a "similarity of suction." It was a natural mistake because, even the Bible says that God created man in His image, and when you completely understand this you will see that our universe is the mirror image of the Spiritual universe. We are composed of a perfect opposite, except that energy can exist without us but we can not exist without it. This means that we really are created from the Spiritual universe.
I will explain the above: True suction is the only thing that can explain how it is possible to get something from just space. Space has to be whatever it is that space is. We don't know what space is, but I know that it has to have this one characteristic. Without it space would have to be just nothing, and you can not get something from nothing, but we are ephemeral: We can only judge what seems real to us..
We can not really relate to reality because we are not really real. We are ephemeral. With the characteristic of true suction, space could never be perfectly balanced: it would continually be trying to balance itself, and any disturbance would cause it to become more unbalanced. This is energy and the only way for energy to become a package is for it to become a particle shaped like a smoke ring because a smoke ring has no open ends. It is entirely self contained. So, if we really want to understand every thing, then we need to study "cause and effect."
I stand behind my claim that every star is a past world, or is made up of planets and past worlds. If the world is set back to where it can no longer support the space program we will never get off this planet. Every planet will eventually become part of a star. I firmly believe Mercury was once a moon of Venus. I suspect that every time our moon passes between the earth and the sun it will move a slight distance towards the sun and might eventually become a moon of Venus and eventually move away from Venus and become a moon of Mercury and then be eaten by the sun.
After 53 years of finding nothing but support for this theory and 53 years of science being continually surprised I challenge anyone to publicly state that this theory is wrong.
It is wrong in one sense. It has never been explained in detail. I am only a layman with an eighth grade education. For 53 years I have expected science to contradict me, and by contradicting me we could get to the bottom of understanding. This theory is complete in all phases of understanding. It just can not be explained by old concepts, and what are my chances of explaining something that is totally foreign to both science and myself. I see the workability of this but how can a scientist see this when they are under the belief that everything is based on electricity. Electricity and everything else is a product of creation, but not all creations are a product of nature. I suspect that nuclear reaction is a product of man: not nature. This universe has changed over time.
The dictionary describes suction as an act of sucking, but nowhere in our world of experience is anything actually being sucked, but if you take the dictionary's explanation and apply it to space, everything becomes explainable. Since I have come up with this theory they changed the way some dictionaries describe suction. My old dictionary describes suction as "the act of sucking.
We do not see anything directly. A pattern of energy must come from the object we see and make an impression on our eyes. Our eyes must be made up of sensors that relays it to our brain where it again must go through another process before we recognize what we are looking at.. A diamond is not made up of hard particles that just pop out of space. Hardness and weight are not a thing in themselves. It is the kind of interaction between all things that make up what we call weight and hardness. A ton of lead actually weights nothing, but because everything is relative: it is pushed that much. A diamond is actually not hard at all. All of this comes under the term of "true relativity."
For example, we believe we are seeing close to 13 billion light years back in time. This means that everything out to close to 13 billion light years is pushing against our galaxy, and to some extent on everything within our galaxy.
Everything in a galaxy is being pushed to some degree by everything else in the universe out to the distance that it is possible for light to travel. A galaxy is not being pulled together: it is being pushed together. Most of the push is caused by dark matter. Like true suction, and the air pressure around us, it is there but we can not feel it.
Dark matter is what our ability to see is made of. Like the air pressure around us: we know it is there because there is a way to know, but we do not feel or see it. Some day we will know how to test and work with dark matter. When we do, everyone will be able to stay forever young, and sickness will become a thing of the past. I suspect that all malfunctions will show up in an energy field and by correcting the energy field we will correct the malfunction. I also suspect that most of the information in a cell is stored in its energy field.
Einstein used James Bradley''s explanation as proof that his theory was right. I agree; if his explanation were correct, my theory would have to be wrong. I say his explanation is wrong because if he was right we would not see anything exactly where it was except under certain conditions and astronomers would have discovered this a long time ago. I explained this discrepancy in 1964 and not one single person, in all this time, has said I was wrong. You can read about this under "Items of interest."
Some years back I said I suspected that atomic time was related to our velocity through space, and if the velocity changed, the time would change. I believe they are now finding this to be true. If Einstein is right...atomic time will not change because he says that everything moves space...so... "there would be no movement through space:" It would be moving with space. So this might turn out to be another way to prove my theory.
The following is another prediction that seems to have come true. At least the gigantic part. Also you have to realize that I did not know about the gigantic explosions they are finding today.
In the early seventies or late sixties I suggested to NASA that gigantic explosions within a galaxy might cause the spiral arms to be created. Most of the explosion would be absorbed within the galaxy, but that portion going into outer space would set up a gravitational system that would cause other solar systems to follow and eventually slow the escape velocity. This would naturally create a spiral arm because solar systems moving outward from the inside of a galaxy would still have the orbital velocity of their original position within the galaxy. This would naturally create a spiral, If this is true there might be a lot to learn from certain measurements. This is what I mentioned in REWARD #9 "11-09-05" I now suspect that the greatest explosions will eventually occur at the center of galaxies or star clusters.
In the middle sixties I wrote a letter to a science magazine (I still have the receipt) and said there would be a problem. The problem is this: If a space ship is in outer space its velocity will seem to change depending on whether it is traveling with or against the rotation of another planet. They did have problems.
Here is the experiment I mentioned earlier
If some (or most) particles are shaped like smoke-rings (as I say they are) they should become directional when a force is applied against them.
Here is a simple experiment that demonstrates magnetism, and explains the above, and science has never before had a good explanation for this. It also supports my theory.
Take, or make something tubular such as the shell of a ball point pen, or hollow plastic coat hanger. Cut out a 2'' or 3'' length and make...say a wooden, or cardboard washer to force, or glue, onto one end of the tube so that it will be smooth and flat. It is not necessary to make it much over an inch in diameter. Cut a one inch square of cardboard and insert a straight pin, or an end of a toothpick through the center of the square cardboard. This is only to keep it from sliding off by inserting the pin or end of toothpick into the washer end of the tube.
When you blow into the washerless end of the tube you will be applying a force against the air particles that are in between the washer and the square piece of cardboard. This will make them directional. They no longer will be bouncing (or propelling themselves) equally in all directions. There now will be more particles aligned and moving parallel with the flat side of the cardboard. This will let more particles hit the outside of the cardboard and hold it on, than are hitting it on the inside trying to push it off. No matter how hard you blow you can not blow it off, even if you point it at the floor and blow...Yes, you read that right: you can not blow it off, even if you point it at the floor while blowing. This explains why the pressure decreases when the velocity increases. It also explains magnetism, but the magnetism we know, is in a medium that we can not, as yet, detect and has greater velocities. It also explains how tornadoes and hurricanes get some of their energy...I also suspect that everything is many times larger than what we perceive things to be. This is very strong evidence that I am right.
The theory for everything has to be something entirely natural. Even if Einstein's "Dense Singularity" gave all the right answers. You still would not know anything basic. This is the problem I am having with math. math gives a mathematical explanation, but no basic understanding. Scientists put a lot of faith in Einstein...Well, Einstein said everything is made of energy, and so do I. The only way you are going to create energy from something that basically is not physically something is by my theory; nothing else will work. This is why I have always said that I know this is right.
To understand an energy field Just picture everything in its own plastic bag. The speed of light inside this bag will always be constant relative to the bag no matter what the velocity of the bag is. Waves entering this bag from an external source will be closer together when the bag is moving towards it, and spread apart when it is moving away from it. Another way...is to think of it like a magnetic field but of a different nature.
In 1954 someone suggested I read the book "The Universe and DR. ''Einstein;" so if I have,
or will quote something, it probably came from this book.
I suspect that everything in its own way (if we could understand it) is related to life, and that life will form anywhere the environment does not go from extremes to extremes. This seems to have come true also.
I do not believe that science will ever make any real great strides in science or medicine until they realize that this theory is right.
Think about this: If there ever was a time when nothing existed, then nothing could ever change. You can not have change unless there is something to change. How could nothing change into something? The answer is: by having a characteristic that permits creation. I have no way of knowing if space is something, or just nothing with a charteristic.
It is far better to be wrong than to be sorry. So if you never do anything else in your life time...please do the following...It won't cost you anything to pass this information on. I say it will cost our great grandchildren their future if you don't. I say this is no laughing matter. I can also say that I am almost never wrong on anything I have put a lot of thought into. If this is wrong it will be a first. I firmly believe that every planet will eventually become part of a star. So if you care about your grandchildren having a future, then do not waste any time passing this information on. You will never regret it. Pease e-mail this address to all your friends... http://www.pioneer-net.com/~jessep/ my e-mail is: jessep@pioneer-net.com
Copyright
Copyright