"Rewards"
I am canceling all rewards for my families peace of mind because I do not expect to live much longer.
Number four proves the future can never be as long as the past has been.
There is no direct way to prove my theory, but I believe I can visualize things in my mind better than scientists can. It is so easy for me to see that galaxies do not behave the way they should if gravity were a pull. See Gravity The proof for my theory is its ability to make correct predictions; so, how is it possible to make predictions from a theory for 55 years,and not have a single prediction proven wrong, plus having several proven right, unless the theory is correct? My theory is not that hard believe. Look at the facts. I am now beginning to believe that science will not accept this until the public forces them to accept it.
12-06-07
People need to understand that my basic theory is just that "true suction is a reality." This all by itself explains why everything has always been here. This means that the entire electrical phenomena can be explained by this alone. I feel that science should understand that the reason for everything being here has to be something entirely natural or there never would have been anything here in the first place. True suction is just not natural to us because it is the cause: We only experience what is created: not the creating process.
Why the universe is here has been explained in all the early dictionaries. See Items of interest Read items of interest next. It and gravity pretty much says it all.
My entire web-site should be read every six months because I keep coming up with better ways of explaining and making it more understandable. At times on a daily basis.
What I am really doing is betting $3,500:00 to nothing that I am right. For 53 years now I do not believe I have been very wrong about anything, and this will continue. I will pay two thousand dollars to the first person that proves the basis of this (my theory) is wrong. Also, to show how certain I am that this is right, I will pay one thousand dollars to the first person that can prove any one, or more, of the eight predictions are entirely wrong. Just a better explanation won't do. I have now added more. This has now grown to more than 15. I will also pay $500:00 to the first person that proves my theory for gravity is wrong.
2-08-04: I will add this to my reward list: "Astronomers will find stars orbiting faster than they think they should at the center of all galaxies." I realize now that they can not even see a star at the center of any galaxy. What they are seeing could be tornadoes. The atmosphere at a galaxy's center should be very heavy because I say that gravity is not a thing: it is the result of a push.
On this date 4-25-05 I will add the following to go with the sentence above: Astronomers may not find stars orbiting at the center of galaxies. It might be so violent at the center of galaxies that stars break up. If you have any questions contact me at... jessep@pioneer-net.com All galaxies will have stars orbiting their center. (but only if gravity is a push) In the above I mean the exact center. Do not confuse this with the symmetrical center.
1. "Everything that exists is created except space." Time is not created, but the way you record it is created.
2. "Gravity is many times greater at the center of galaxies and star clusters."
2 a Gravity and electrons are not things in themselves.
3. "Every star is a past world." Not necessarily a past civilization, but a past world. I very strongly believe that stars become planets and that planets become worlds and that worlds become stars, or part of a star, or explode. I now predict that gravity is many times greater at the center of galaxies. My theory has always predicted this; it just took time to realize it. Astronomers will soon (?) discover the truth of this. It is the push of gravity, not Black Holes, that astronomers are seeing, or perhaps I should say..."are not seeing." With a push of gravity, a star (or stars) at the center of a galaxy or star cluster, if the cluster is large enough, does not need a body to orbit around, but they can orbit even faster if they do. They can just orbit against the push of gravity.
4. "There has already been more time gone by in the past than can ever be in the future." For those of you that do not get this, think of something that has been traveling through time forever; it has only one point it time: "Now." This same object traveling on into the future will forever have two points: "Now" and wherever it will be in the future. This new measurement can never be laid along side the past and be equal in length. (The only thing related to time that had a beginning is how we experience time. We do not know what "true time" or "true size" is and a signal has to travel to our brain and be deciphered before we experience anything.) It would be very easy for people to be fooled by virtual-reality, and it probably happens a lot during our life-time. For example: Send the same signal to our brain and we will see, feel or hear exactly the same as if it had really happened. This explains how we see ghosts and a lot of other things."
There can never be as much untraveled time as what has already been traveled in the past. The past has only one point in time: "Now." The past has always existed: it can not be measured. The future will forever be measurable and have two points in time. Time is as real as space has to be.
5. "Nothing can travel from here to the ends of space...for the simple reason that there are no ends of space to travel to." "Space is endless." A circle is endless, meaning there is no obvious end, but every point in a circle is both a beginning and an end. Why would anyone believe that we are inside a bubble? What would this bubble be suspended in??? "More space of course." Why would our part of space have magical powers that other parts would not? What can happen in one part of space can happen anywhere in space, and space is endless. Trust me.
6. "My theory is the only explanation there could be that needs no explanation: because the dictionary already explains it, and it is not a thing: it is just a characteristic."
7. "Gravity and magnetism are both a push, not a pull, with the exception that "True Suction" plays a major role." (Don't relate what I have just said to what you think of as suction. Read Items of interest) If gravity were a pull, all galaxies would form the same pattern. The size of a so-called black hole is directly related to the thickness and density of the area it is found in. This proves that gravity is a push. You will never find a black hole in outer space between the galaxies. If you do, it would have to be at the center of a large star-cluster or a cluster of galaxies. Also you must take into consideration the size of stars and/or planets that are merging.
8. "There are many things that were not created by nature."
9. "The Big Bang never happened." I won't say that a galaxy cannot explode. This would have the same effect.
10. "The reason for everything being here has always been here, but life as we know it, might not have been created by nature alone."
11. "The moon keeps the same face towards the earth because of the drag of the energy fields." 12-05-07: I am in the process of paying this because in my estimation another person had a better (?) explanation. I paid this, not because I was wrong, but because I wanted his help. Both ideas could be considered "Drag."
12. "If gravity were a pull...all galaxies would be, in somewhat, the shape of a donut, and a solar-system moving through a galaxy's center of gravity would have all its planets moved farther away from its sun."
13. "A star at the center of a galaxy or star cluster (if the cluster is large enough) does not need anything to orbit around if gravity is a push." Am I the only one that can understand this?
14. "The universe is not expanding." It is already endless, but our part of it could still be expanding if an entire galaxy exploded.
15. Last but not least: "Every person living on this planet has been alive, at the very least, for several million years:" I am talking about an overlooked fact that even you will have to agree with.
"Every living person has been alive for millions of years."
If you traced your life back you would eventually reach a time when you were nothing but a single cell which had just divided from a cell which then became a single cell and started all over again. That same cell has been alive and dividing as long as humans have lived here on earth, and a whole lot longer. If at any time in the past, that cell had died...you would not be here, and if life fell here from exploded worlds, as I suspect, then for all practical purposes we might have been alive forever. Also this would explain why there are so many talented people in this world. and why I am getting all this information. We have experienced it all, except total extermination.
I believe this is why I...with only an eighth grade education...and almost no knowledge of science (thank goodness) was able to come up with all of this...because we have already experienced it all, except total extermination; we just need to jog our memories. I said "thank goodness" because if I had of been taught what science believed, I would never have even considered such a theory, but by this time I had seen how much it could explain. Right now I think it would be impossible for me to believe otherwise.
Tomorrow will be forever and a day.
The following are my proven predictions: Starting with the earliest.
I consider this a true prediction: This was my very first prediction, but I did not think of it as being a prediction. I was just making a statement: In a letter to Scientific American my theory predicted dark matter, but I did not call it dark matter I just said there was a lot we could not see. It took me many years before I made the connection. My web-site explains this. This is my first real deliberate prediction: Science will eventually discover that there is no such thing as a true solid. Later I found out that science had already came to that conclusion; this told me that I was on the right track.
This is my second prediction that came true: I told an older brother that there had to be some way to package energy, and that I would find it, and I did. Let me do a little explaining here. This is very important because you need to understand my state of mind at this time. In my mind at this time I just knew that I was right because I thought my explanation of why everything was possible was already a proven fact. I thought that all I had to do was just mention it and scientists would instantly see and understand why it had to be right. At this time I did not know about the experiment that, on the surface, seemed to prove I was wrong. The point I am trying to make here is that my belief that I was right was so strong that I just knew I was going to find a way to package energy. I told an older brother that there had to be a way and that I would find it, which I did. This will be explained later.
You also need to understand that I go to extremes to make sure I am not just convincing myself that my theory is correct.
In 1964 I predicted that everything had an energy field. (I first called this an Either field because I believe this is the medium that light travels in.) 29 years later (1993) I heard on the news that everything really does have an energy field. I was already convinced I was right. This just put more icing on the cake.
This prediction has 53 years of proof: From day one my theory has predicted that science will continue to find surprises until my theory has been accepted. This just keeps going on and on.
11-02-05: I did predict (before I read about it) that head-on collisions were what caused the bright and disappearing flashes.
This just has to be true: Every person living on this planet has been alive, at the very least, for several million years. This is explained in REWARDS.
There is no way that this can be wrong: I will pay $100:00 to the first person that can show me how the following could be wrong: (Prove it and earn $1,000:00) There has already been more time gone by in the past than can ever be in the future. Let me do a little explaining here: Science believes time is a fourth dimension or a man made concept (?). One or the other, or both. If nothing at all existed, there just would not be any way to keep a record of it.
Anyone can understand why this has to be true: To be able to orbit, a star at the center of a galaxy or star cluster (if the cluster is large enough) does not need anything to orbit around if gravity is a push. All it has to do is orbit against the push of gravity. I believe science has accepted this.
I believe they did find proof of this: "Change our velocity and I suspect atomic time will change."
I say the following predictions have to be right.
The theory for everything has to be something entirely natural.
Light eventually slows down and ends. I have an explanataion for this.
The universe is not expanding unless a galaxy exploded.
There is not as much missing matter inside a galaxy as science thinks there is.
It might be so violent at the center of galaxies that stars break up, if gravity is a push.
How a star is born. All large bodies in space have a hot core; the larger the body, the hotter the core.
The reason for everything being here has always been here.
The moon keeps the same face towards the earth because of the drag of the energy fields, and gravity.
If gravity were a pull...all galaxies would be the shape of a donut.
True suction is nature.
I predict that all stable particles are shaped like a smoke ring. This does not include particles made up of smaller particles.
A universe of some sorts has been here forever.
When a space probe is in outer space its velocity will seem to change when it enters another planet's energy field. I also suspect that light speeds up when you are far from the nearest planet. They did have problems.
Astronomers can not even come close to seeing what is at the center of a galaxy. Through me, they learned that a planet or star does not need anything to orbit around at the center of a galaxy or star cluster "if gravity is a push" and the cluster is large enough.
Everything that exists is created except space. Gravity is many times greater at the center of galaxies and star clusters. 5-25-06: Gravity is not a thing in itself: It is, cause and effect: "A happening." A push of gravity is not comparable, or any way related to a pull of gravity.
Nothing can travel from here to the ends of space.
Space and the universe are endless.
Gravity and magnetism are both a push, not a pull, with the exception that "True Suction" plays a major role.
The Big Bang never happened, unless a large portion of a galaxy exploded. 11-11-06 I suspect that a large portion of a galaxy can explode if it contains enough dust in the right density.
A push of gravity becomes more violent towards the center. It is this violence that makes them believe it is a black hole. I say there is very little that science is exactly right about.
The only thing that can be here just because it is here, is empty space.
Nobody can understand the mechanics of a pull of gravity. Everybody should be able to understand a push of gravity.
A test they are supposed to make some time in the future where one probe will follow the earth, and another will lead the earth, will prove that light passing the earth will not behave like a bullet. The Gravity Probe B might prove this. 8-18-06 This probe may be designed for something else.
Black holes do not exist You will never find what appears to be a black hole in outer space between galaxies unless it is at the center of something, such as the center of a cluster of galaxies.
There is no pull of gravity.
Every star is made up of past worlds and planets.
I also say that what they believe is a bright young star could be a bright old star.
Nothing can ever be longer than the past.
I say that "space" is the one thing that just has to be here, and that true suction makes everything possible; including a Spiritual universe.
I now predict that a star will live as long as it has enough planets and worlds to feed on. I now suspect that there is a limit to how large a star can be. If this turns out to be true, this might be used to measure distance. The largest stars might also be the brightest.
I say that it is impossible to have a situation in which nothing exists.
The past is forever.
I predict that stars become planets, and that planets become worlds, and that worlds become stars, or parts of stars, or explode.
I wrote and said they should look in the vicinity of a so called exploded star to see if perhaps the star might still be there...My guess was that it was a world, not a star. Later I found out that they already knew that a star was still there, but I had not known that, so it was an honest prediction.
10-05-05: I suspect that these gamma ray bursts are caused by two stars, or a star and a planet colliding head on, and the debris spurting outward at an extremely high velocity. I suspect it is possible for x-rays to become gamma rays. Contact me and I will explain how.
For almost 53 years I have been saying that I believed that life fell here from worlds that have exploded.
A signal does not last forever, including light.
In 1966 while living at Tillamook, Oregon I read an item in the paper about a Laser Gyroscope. I wrote and told them that it disproved Einstein's theory: An observer on the gyroscope would get three different measurements for the speed of light.
If perpetual motion were not possible there never would have been a universe or Universal Mind.
I suspect that some, I should say most, particles are created from space tension. I also suspect that this causes the micro-wave background noise.
I suspect the universe is forever changing and is made up of many stages.
Also in 1964 I tried to get the physics department of Oregon State University to conduct an experiment to prove that everything had an energy field.
If Einstein and James Bradley were right, any light at right angles to the earth's orbit would have to be off by two (?) seconds of an arc.
This seems to have come true also. I suspect that everything in its own way (if we could understand it) is related to life, and that life will form anywhere the environment does not go from extreme to extremes. However, life might require some variation of climate.
I suspect the atmosphere at the center of galaxies is very heavy. 1-08-06: I now say it is also very hot.
I believe the reason we are not hearing from other civilizations is because they do not survive very long after reaching our stage of technology. 5-25-06: I now very much suspect that there is a limit to how large a body can be before causing a large enough explosion at its center, to destroy all intelligence that has not prepared for such, because no one realizes or understands it will happen.
What keeps telling me I am on the right track, is the fact that my theory tells me how things should be, and then I find th0ey are just like my theory says they should be; so far 100%. This means that up to this point I have not made any predictions that have been proven wrong, and I have made many. One of my first predictions was that everything was much larger than what we see; this also means that time is also much longer than what we experience it. I expect this to be proven true. 7-31-07 I no longer see the need of being a whole lot larger.
With so many predictions, why can't some be proven wrong? I say it is because I am right.
http://www.pioneer-net.com/~jessep/.
Home Page .........Copyright
Copyright
You can reach me at this address...
P. O. Box 714 Winston, Oregon 97496