fI"

THEORY OF EVERYTHING

To The Real World

By Jesse Babcock

The father of future science,

and this world's only reality authority.

When I say everything, I mean "Everything,"

including electricity, magnetism, gravity

and anything else you can think of.

Rewards total $3,500.

How is it possible to make predictions from a theory for 55 years,and not a single prediction be proven wrong, plus having several proven right, unless the theory is correct?

I may be away from the computer until the latter part of June. At that time I will attempt to show the relation between my theory and math.

06-14-08. Im back. I would have been back sooner, but I spent close to six weeks in the hospital and Rehab. My large intestine was removed.

The reason math is important to scientists: is because they believe a particle is a thing in itself. The only thing that is a thing in itself is "Space." In one respect they are things in themselves: They are the maps which, when understood, will explain the action that it is causing to happen. Math will get answers, but never any explanation. I believe everything is much larger than what we see. We may never see what particles are doing to space. The entire world of science is almost entiirely built on imagination. My entire world is (as explained) built on commom sense. I expect to improve on this explanation.

I do not believe Einstein even had a theory: I say that he got the answers to his equations by having light stand still and everything else do the moving. This will tell him how much time dilation is needed for each problem.

Keep in mind that I have been making predictions based on my theory for 54 years and not a single prediction has been proven wrong. You can tell how true a theory is by its ability to make correct predictions.

There is a powerful force at work that is keeping people from seeing and understanding my theory. There has to be a Spiritual Universe out there. There will forever be a Religion. I want to go down in history as being the person that saved this civilization. I firmly believe every star represents a past world.

There is no way I could have predicted all the things I predicted without making a lot of mistakes unless all my predictions are true. Go back 54 years of science and look at all the correct predictions I made. If I am right it is only natural that I would be the only authority on reality. Anyone with a fully functional brain can figure out that gravity cannot possibly be a pull, and if gravity is not a pull: black holes can not exist. Go to Gravity for an expanded explanation. One of my strongest supports for my theory is the fact thaatr I knew very little about science, so how was it possible to make so many correct predictions. So far not one single prediction has been proven wrong, and several have already been proven right. Scientists believe a lot of my predictions are wrong because my predictions do not agree with their mistaken views of the universe. After 54 years of not having a single prediction proven wrong, and several proven right, and me witnessing 54 years of science (especially astronomers) having to continually change their way of thinking, then I must surely be on to something? I predicted: everything had an energy field 29 years (1964 to 1993) before I heard on the news that everything really does have an energy field. But, since 1964 I have found only one physicist that would listen: a lady physicist that taught physics in a Christian college. She finally had to quit because of a brain tumor. Now, years later, I know that I have absolute proof that gravity can not be a pull.

Go to Items of interest for some predictions that have already came true, But my theory may be treading on forbidden ground. Its a sad day when even our greatest scientists can not realize that the future will forever be trying to match the time that has already expired, but it will never happen. The reason is: God has always existed and there is no time greater than that, and it makes no difference whether God experiences time or not. Time would still lapse even if nothing at all existed. I believe I can now truthfully say that I am the only person that really understands Einstein's and contemporary theories. It seems that I am the only person that realizes that Einstein let light stand still and everything else move. This tells you how much time dilation is needed for each problem. Then once you know this you can then let light move and know how much time dilation is needed for that problem. This will work as long as you work one problem at a time. This is why you need to do each problem in its own time frame. What a person believes: is reality to that person. The truth is: a so called electron is only substituting: (taking the place of) a much longer and needed explanation.

It took me all these years to figure out why science believes math is needed to understand nature. I did not know what to look for. What I have found is that science, instead looking for the explanation, is taking an entire unknown explanation and given it a name. One such example is an electron: it attracts or repels a certain amount. It works up to a point, but we still do not know the mechanism of what is doing the attracting or repelling. They are bypassing the real explanation. Now if someone would just explain to me why science believes the red shift of light means the universe is expanding? Light is naturally going to shift to the red end of the spectrum the farther it has to travel. Distance is what causes the red shift.

I have proven that there is no such thing as a pull of gravity: because a pull of gravity will empty the center of a galaxy: Only the radius of a galaxy can trap and hold anything if gravity were a pull. Science built their theories from observation. I built my theories from common sense. Both theories satisfies observation, but so far I do not believe I have made a single mistake. I know I have proven that gravity can not be a pull. Go to Gravity The reason for everything being here has to be simple and entirely natural. Also black holes and neutron stars do not exist. Also the past has been forever; so where is everybody? Do you now see why it is so important to get all your friends to read this? If you keep using your head you can figure out why this is the only explanation there ever can be. Everything had to come from nothing but empty space. Including a Supreme being, or a Supreme (Spiritual) civilization.

Eureka Eureka Eureka: On this date 8-11-07, and after I became 92 years old it finally got through my thick head why scientists believe math is important and needed in order to understand the universe: The reason is simple: science believes that electrons are a thing in themselves and have the ability to pull or repel. If we could see what is actually taking place we would see that there is an action going on that is pushing things together or pushing them apart. It is because of what we can not see that causes science to believe that they are a thing in themselves. Only when we can see this will we understand the mechanics of how things are pushed together or apart. Math has nothing to do with it. It is how they perform that makes it look like they are a thing in themselves. We can not see this because there is so much dark energy and dark matter involved.ff I believe this theory could have saved astronomy many billions of dollars. At the end of Rewards are many predictions. A few could be one way or the other, but most will come true. Math seems to be important because there are systems in the makeup of everything that can merge or push themselves away from another system. One such system is what science calls an electron.

8-05-07: Certainly particles are energized, but not negatively, or positively, and certainly they can combine or push themselves away, but what science thinks of as a magnetic field: has to be an entire system of particles behaving in a way that has to be witnessed before it can be understood. I suspect there is more dark matter in our makeup than there are particles that we can see. If science could actually see what is happening: they would then see and understand the mechanism of all the above. For example: What is the complete explanation of a sudden burst of wind? Why does this seem to bounce from one place to another? There are contemporary explanations, but I see it as needing a more detailed explanation. If there were some way to make all the air particles face the same direction you would have more than just a sudden burst of wind. Also if you could cause all the particles in a given area to collapse: you would, no doubt, have the most powerful explosion possible. Perhaps the equivalent of the Big Bang. One or the other of the above is the only way I could buy the concept of a Big Bang. I do believe it is possible for a large portion of a galaxy to explode: such as these dust filled areas that astronomers believe are star forming areas.

8-04-07 Science will never understand reality until they realize that particles and stars are the result of happenings, and are not a thing in themselves. Go back to 1953 (The time of my theory) and count all the changes science has had to make. Now count the changes I have had to make. If you can find one, let me know. What does this tell you???

The very basic function of matter is: smoke-ring-like particles which true suction is trying to collapse, and hair-like, tornado-like, particles which might have many functions: perhaps lightening, and play many parts in the buildup of matter.

8-04-02 What science thinks of as an electron: is not a single particle, but a basic combination of dark energy and dark matter forming a basic pattern that science sees as a particle, and when combined: it forms another basic pattern. This is why science sees math and particles as being a basic component. I see math as only a shortcut. Dark matter is only matter too small to see. A microscope only shows what it can see. Science will never understand reality until they realize that particles and stars are the result of happenings, and are not a thing in themselves. Every dictionary has one word in it that, all by itself, can explain naturally, everything there is to explain. This even explains why a God has always been here. I can not comprehend why so many people believe that everything is here just because it is here. Go to "items of interest." for a continuation of this line of thought. A few years ago this theory not only made it to first place on the Internet, but my Internet provider had to block access to it. This might explain why it is taking so long for science to accept this? People need to understand that my basic theory is just that "true suction is a reality." This all by itself explains why everything, including a God, has always been here. This means that the entire electrical phenomena has to be explained by this alone. I feel that science should understand that the reason for everything being here has to be something entirely natural or there never would have been anything here in the first place. True suction is just not natural to us because it is the cause of us being here: We only experience what is created. We do not experience the creation process. Once you fully understand this theory you will be able to understand that even the Spiritual world is natural, but it can experience and do things we can never experience until we enter Heaven. This is completely understandable. It is just not natural to us because it does not play any part in our daily experience, but we can not exist without it. I suspect that it does play a part in our dreams, but never in our daily experience.

True suction is not a thing: it is just a characteristic of "space." I even knew an engineer, and a college student that believed our kind of suction was unlimited. I say "true suction" is unlimited. This has to be the explanation for everything because "true suction" is the only explanation that would make space dynamic.

The main reason it is taking science so long to publicly accept this is because too many people are not passing this on to their friends and relatives. I bet that in the secret world of science they have known for a long time that this is the only explanation there every can be. I can see so many things they are doing that relates to my theory.

If you had a long line of same size stars spaced evenly apart and have the center two stars orbiting each other: every complete orbit will have aligned them twice in a straight line with all the other stars. When they are in a straight line, their orbital momentum will cause both stars to move in a more or less straight line instead of orbiting because when aligned they are pulled as much one way as the other. If gravity were a pull this would cause all galaxies to open up. A push of gravity would cause a galaxy to become more condensed at its center, and this is what they are seeing, not black holes. As they move outward this increases the distance between them because they are now moving in a straight line, and in opposite directions of each other. At the very least if they still orbit each other their orbit will be much larger. The aabove has to be true.

These original stars will soon leave the area entirely or they will orbit different stars and while they are doing all this they will be pulling the neighbors out of alignment and causing the neighbors to come towards each other and start orbiting each other. This will be repeated until the entire center of a galaxy is gone, and all these stars will be captured somewhere within the radius of the galaxy. A push of gravity will compact the center of a galaxy; a pull of gravity will empty the center of a galaxy. I want to make one thing very clear: I am not a well educated person, and for the most of these fifty plus years I have kept it that way because this is almost absolute proof that I am right: because how is it possible for a person so unlearned as myself to keep seeing more and more of my predictions come true, and in over fifty years not have a single one proven wrong. Science is continually having to revise their theories, but my theory keeps getting more support.

Keep in mind that I predicted everything had an energy field 29 years before I heard on the news that everything really does have an energy field, and that was news at that time. (Why did he use the word "really" unless it was a surprise to him?) Make a copy of my predictions and keep them for posterity.f I can guarantee that if this theory is ever proven wrong I will be the most surprised person on the entire face of this earth. The only thing I can see holding this back is that almost everybody believes that something can be here just because it has always been here. I could never buy into that because I would have to ask: "Why has it always been here?" No math is needed to understand why everything is here, but I understand perfectly why science believes math lets you understand.

There is no place but empty space for anything to come from. What else, other than my theory, could make space dynamic and not need an explanation for being here? We think of space as nothing. It all is just the way nature is. After I came up with my theory some dictionaries have changed the way they describe suction, but my old dictionary describes suction: "as an act of sucking." This means that in the old days they had a better concept of reality than science does now. Plus, I predicted that everything had an energy field 29 years before I heard on the news that everything "really" does have an energy field. (Why did he use the word "really?" unless he knew of my long running prediction?) This is only one of several predictions that have came true. I first called an energy field an (Ether) aether(?) field because I believe this is the medium that light travels in. Also please keep in mind that in the late sixties or no later than 1971 I wrote the Kennedy Space center and predicted the massive explosions that scientists are seeing today, but the Big ones are yet to come. A short time later there was a news item in the Roseburg paper from NASA saying something about unbelievable enormous explosions. I may still have the article. It also stated that "now that science knew what was in-between the stars, or something of that nature. science should now be able to make great advances. This is only a fraction of all the evidence I have found that shows I am right. I have made many predictions, several have already been proven correct. (Scientists have made many predictions and almost every month they find something wrong.) The reason for everything being here has to be something entirely natural. Anyone should be able to realize this has to be true. I welcome all comments. jessep@pioneer-net.com If for some reason you do not get a reply: check under Items of interest

A black hole can not anchor a galaxy if gravity were a pull. If you moved a black hole the only thing it would do is eat that portion it moved towards. If you moved the galaxy: the hole would just eat everything that moved close to it. If you had two black holes anchored close to each other you could move one away from the other, and it would, lessen, not increase the others tendency to follow. The same with the galaxy. If you moved the galaxy, the black hole would eat what moved toward it. It only seems like it could anchor a galaxy, and it could anchor any single item that orbited around it, but if this single item had a moon the black hole would soon eat the moon. This should prove to you that black holes do not exist. I see a lot of truth in the above.

The universe can not be younger than this: If astronomers are seeing outward 13 billion light years then the following does apply. Astronomers believe they are seeing 13 billion years back into time so all the following applies. If the big bang originated right here where we are, then we can look out in any direction 13 billion light years and say "This is what our portion of the universe right here looked like thirteen billion years ago," but if we are not at the point of origin of the big bang, then we can look in that direction "13 billion light years away" and say "This is what our part of the universe looked like 13 billion years ago." but if we then turn the telescope and look in the opposite direction from the origin of the big bang we will have to say that we are seeing something that is at least 26 billion years younger than what we seen in the first direction when we looked towards the big bang because it would take that long for the big bang to reach that point. Plus on top of all this, it would take the image 13 billion years more to bring this information back to us here. This means that what we seen first had to be at least 39 billion years old at the time we seen it. Let me explain this another way: Lets say a runner that can run the speed of light leaves from someplace between us and the origin of the big bang and it takes him 13 billion light years to reach us here and then he keeps running another 13 billion light years.. That is a total of 26 billion years that it took him to reach that point. Now if he then puts up a sign, it will take the image of that sign 13 billion more years to reach us back here on earth. That makes a total of 39 billion years that we can know the universe has been in existence. There are people out there that can see and understand this. Why don't scientists see it? Any person that can believe time had a beginning: is living under some sort of a hypnotic spell. Astronomers must believe the big bang originated right here where we are because everything looks about the same, no matter which direction they look? But, even this has flaws because it would take around thirteen billion years for the big bang to expand that far, and another thirteen billion years for the image to travel back to where we are, and by the time the image got back here the big bang would have expanded another thirteen billion years for a total of 26 billion years.. At the end of REWARDS are 10 predictions that have already came true. (Let me make this perfectly clear. These are predictions that I was able to make because this theory points out that they have to be right.) Plus over 40 more that eventually will be proven to be true. Some day you will understand this. Please e-mail this address to all your friends... http://www.pioneer-net.com/~jessep/ Do you have a question, or just speak your mind? I welcome all comments, good or bad. jessep@pioneer-net.com }

Copyright

back to Top

Copyright